MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2469323228 · doi:10.5802/aif.3085

Polynomial Bound on the Local Betti Numbers of a Real Analytic Germ

2017· preprint· en· W2469323228 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de l’institut Fourier · 2017
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCommutative Algebra and Its Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsBetti numberMathematicsGermIsolated singularityTangent coneUpper and lower boundsPolynomialAlgebraic varietyAlgebraic numberCombinatoricsPure mathematicsDiscrete mathematicsTangentMathematical analysisSingularityGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proves the existence of a bound on the sum of local Betti numbers of a real analytic germ by a polynomial function of the multiplicity of the germ. This result can be interpreted as a localization of the classical Oleinik–Petrovsky bound (aka. Thom–Milnor bound) on the sum of Betti numbers of a semi-algebraic set. The key elements of the proof are the tangent cone of the germ, the Thom–Mather topological trivialization theorem, the Oleinik–Petrovsky bound, and a result by D. Mumford and J. Heintz bounding the degrees of the generators of an ideal by a polynomial function of the geometric degree of its associated variety. Our result is then applied to yield bounds on known geometric invariants: the Lipschitz–Killing invariants, and the Vitushkin variations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it