Patterns in the Distribution and Abundance of Selected Zooplankton Species from the Coast of British Columbia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractData on the distribution and abundance of the calanoid copepods Calanus plumchrus, C. cristatus, and Eucalanus bungii bungii and the chaetognaths Sagitta elegans and Eukrohnia hamata were obtained in 1977 from two cruises along the British Columbia coast. Stations adjacent to the Strait of Georgia were strongly influenced by an annual intrusion of offshore water, which carried large numbers of immigrant zooplankters, while those in Loughborough Inlet and the vicinity of Dean and Burke channels had a higher proportion of resident species and a less obvious intrusion. Species in Douglas Channel suggested an intrusion that did not appear in the hydrographic data and also indicated that Douglas Channel may be unique with respect to the other inlets studied. Patterns of distribution for the five species support previously recognized patterns in zooplankton communities and hydrographic regimes along the coast, and show that the formation and maintenance of zooplankton communities there is a combination ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".