MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2470819892

Explaining behavior in an internet-based learning environment

2006· article· en· W2470819892 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnual Conference on Computers · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicOnline and Blended Learning
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe InternetTheory of planned behaviorControl (management)Component (thermodynamics)Empirical researchPsychologyTechnology acceptance modelLearning environmentComputer scienceApplied psychologyKnowledge managementHuman–computer interactionArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide WebUsabilityMathematics education
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Researchers have been actively investigating technology acceptance for the past decade. Although the use of virtual environments has become a significant component of the workplace, the factors that contribute to its acceptance are still unclear. More specifically, research on the acceptance factors of internet-based learning environments is still in its infancy. Using the theory of planned behavior, this empirical study attempts to understand the influence of three factors: attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control, on student's intentions to use an internet-based learning environment. Results show that of the three factors, perceived behavioral control has the highest impact. This finding has important ramifications on the design and implementation of internet-based learning environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.571
Threshold uncertainty score0.577

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it