Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is a long history of seaweed consumption including Phaeophyceae, Chlorophyceae and Rhodophyceae taxonomies in Asia and the Pacifics, versus low to zero intakes in Europe and the Americas. This dietary difference between populations coincides with dramatic differences in diet-related chronic disease risks such as breast cancer in these groups. Animal model evidence points to a role for edible algae in antioxidant-mediated effects in vivo. As intertidal organisms, seaweeds require an endogenous antioxidant capacity to protect against oxidative stress from UV light and dessication during tidal fluctuations. The antioxidant capacity of algae include L-ascorbic acid, glutathione, carotenoids, tocopherols, chlorophyll derivatives, polyphenols such as the phlorotannins in brown kelp and mycosporine-like amino acids in red algae. This chapter reviews the evidence underlying the antioxidant mechanisms of these algal constituents and discusses various issues for their analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it