Power Allocation for Buffer-Aided Full-Duplex Relaying With Imperfect Self-Interference Cancelation and Statistical Delay Constraint
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper considers source and relay power allocation for buffer-aided full-duplex (B-FD) relaying network, assuming constant data rate arrivals at the source buffer. Statistical delay constraint is imposed, where the end-to-end queue length is allowed to exceed a pre-defined queue-length threshold with a maximum acceptable queue-length-outage probability. We assume imperfect self-interference (SI) cancelation, where the non-zero residual SI power is modeled to be proportional to the relay transmit power. We investigate two power allocation problems for source arrival rate maximization: 1) B-FD relaying with adaptive power allocation (B-FD-APA) when the instantaneous channel state information at the transmitters (CSIT) is available and 2) B-FD relaying with static power allocation (B-FD-SPA) when only the statistical CSIT is available. To solve the problems, we first employ asymptotic delay analysis to transform the statistical delay constraint into more tractable constraints. Then, the optimal solutions are derived using Lagrangian approach. In addition, solutions for various special cases of residual SI and delay constraint are presented. With B-FD-APA, the relay can opportunistically switch between half-duplex (HD) and FD operation modes according to the channel conditions. With B-FD-SPA, the relay always employs FD mode. Numerical results are performed to compare the capacities of the proposed B-FD, non-buffer FD, and buffer-aided HD relaying schemes, as well as direct transmission (DT) under various settings, demonstrating the effectiveness of B-FD relaying to support delay-constrained communications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".