MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2476381389 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2015.2480014

Field Verification of Secondary Arc Extinction Logic

2015· article· en· W2476381389 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsBC Hydro (Canada)
FundersBC Hydro
KeywordsSynchronismElectric power transmissionEngineeringReliability (semiconductor)Fault (geology)Electrical engineeringArc (geometry)Transmission lineCircuit breakerElectronic engineeringTransmission systemLine (geometry)Transmission (telecommunications)VoltagePower (physics)Mechanical engineeringPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single-phase trip and high-speed reclose (SPTR) schemes applied on extra-high-voltage (EHV) lines offer significant benefits over three-phase schemes as they help maintain synchronism and stability in sparse transmission networks. However, a secondary arc may persist and prevent timely recovery of the air insulation. In this situation, high-speed reclosing will attempt to re-energize the still-faulted line, adding stress to the system instead of benefiting the system from the SPTR scheme. Using staged fault and fault disturbance data recorded from several 500 kV lines, this paper presents validation of an enhanced hybrid scheme incorporating secondary arc extinction detection logic designed to avoid high-speed reclosing onto faults while also allowing single-phase reclose in cases where it would be successful. The new logic is now being applied to several 500 kV lines in BC Hydro to improve transmission system reliability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score0.685

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it