MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2477639662 · doi:10.1115/1.4034333

Hollow Blades for Small Wind Turbines Operating at High Altitudes

2016· article· en· W2477639662 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Solar Energy Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Energy Research and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChord (peer-to-peer)AerodynamicsTurbine bladeTorqueWind speedMoment of inertiaBlade (archaeology)Structural engineeringBlade pitchDensity of airWind powerInertiaTurbineMechanical engineeringControl theory (sociology)Materials scienceEngineeringComputer scienceAerospace engineeringPhysicsMeteorologyElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the air density reduces as altitude increases, operation of small wind turbines (SWTs), which usually have no pitch adjustment, remains challenging at high altitudes due largely to the reduction of starting aerodynamic torque. By reducing the moment of inertia through the use of hollow blades, this study aims to speed up the starting while maintaining the structural integrity of the blades and high output power. A horizontal axis turbine with hollow blades was designed for two sites in Iran with altitude of 500 m and 3000 m. The design variables are the distributions of the chord, twist, and shell thickness and the improvement of output power and starting are the design goals. Blade-element momentum (BEM) theory was employed to calculate these goals and beam theory was used for the structural analysis to investigate whether the hollow timber blades could withstand the aerodynamic and centrifugal forces. A combination of the goals formed the objective function and a genetic algorithm (GA) was used to find a blade whose output power at a predetermined tip speed ratio (TSR) and the starting performance were high while the stress limit was met. The results show that hollow blades have starting times shorter than solid ones by approximately 70%. However, in the presence of generator resistive torque, the algorithm could not find a blade for an altitude of 3000 m. To solve that problem, the tip speed ratio was added to other design variables and another optimization was done which led to the optimal blades for both altitudes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.539
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it