MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W247796502

The Dragon Needs to Soar like the Eagle

2010· article· en· W247796502 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Prashanth Bharadwaj

Bibliographic record

VenueCompetition Forum · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobalization, Economics, and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaWorld economyEconomyMilestoneBRICQuarter (Canadian coin)EconomicsGeographyEconomic historyPolitical scienceCartography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Editiorial In at least past two decades, China has become a global economic player changing dynamics of world economy and altering expectations in several parts of world. This has been evident since second quarter of 2010 when China, for first time, overtook Japan by becoming second biggest economy in world, behind only United States. The second quarter GDP data indicated that China was ahead of Japan by about $50 million in output, which will officially put China in front of its affluent neighbor when annual GDP figures are reckoned at end of 2010. This is indeed a historical milestone for not only two erstwhile adversaries, but also for rest of world. The ramifications of this spectacular ascent of China on global economic stage are expected to be felt worldwide for a long time to come. The U.S. economy is still nearly three times bigger than that of China's. However, recent slow growth and recession in U.S., combined with China's double digit growth and probable 7 percent-8 percent growth rate in near future, will situate China in a highly competitive position. Goldman Sachs coined acronym BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) earlier this decade and demonstrated economic vitality of these newly industrialized economies vis-a-vis traditionally rich G7 countries of Western Europe, North America and Japan. In its 2003 report, they predicted that Chinese economy would overtake Japanese economy by 2015! In same report, Goldman Sachs predicted that Chinese economy would overtake that of U.S. by 2041. This prediction has been revised and Goldman Sachs has suggested instead that this will occur as early as 2027. China, in addition to being most populous country in world, is now world's largest exporter, has highest foreign exchange reserves, and has world's biggest market for cars, Internet, and mobile phones. It also has largest standing army. China has come to be known as factory of world, creating more middle class jobs faster than any other country in recent past. Repeatedly, experts ponder question Can China in 21st century be global economic engine and geopolitical arbiter similar to what United States was in 20th century? Notwithstanding internationally unpopular recent war in Iraq and a few cold war misadventures in 20th century, most would acknowledge that U.S. has been one of most responsible military superpowers in last millennium. Barring recent subprime mortgage crisis and a few financial scandals, economy and business environment in U.S. has had no parallel in history. In spite of disgraceful actions of some politicians in country, strongest democratic institutions and checks-and-balances have been hallmarks of U.S. political scene. The media can function as freely as in any other part of world. Despite recent anti-immigration (mainly anti-illegal immigration) sentiments in some parts of country, no other country has been attracting and welcoming immigrants from every corner of globe as Lady Liberty has been doing since 1880s. Although it took until 1965 for country to assure civil rights to all of its citizens, U.S. today provides equal opportunities to its most diverse group of citizens better than any other country in world. Paraphrasing Ronald Reagan, the United States has been a shining city upon a hill whose beacon light guides freedom-loving people everywhere. Is China ready to equal or surpass role of United States on world stage? The author believes that China needs to work on multiple fronts to even make a claim to have arrived at top of global stage. While Chinese economy is stronger than Soviet Union's ever was, a complex country such as China can easily meet same fate as that of communist Soviet Union if it does not make broad-based progress. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.004
Scholarly communication0.0140.012
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1790.083

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCompetition ForumSame topicGlobalization, Economics, and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207