Longing to Connect: Spirituality in Public Schools
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We all know that what will transform education is not another theory, another book, or another formula, but educators who are willing to seek a transformed way of being in the world -Parker Palmer A growing number of authors are proposing that spirituality be incorporated within the curricula of public schools. 1 In making such proposals, many of these authors are responding to what they perceive as crises in public education caused at least in part by the exclusion of genuine spirituality from elementary and secondary classrooms. Many look to spirituality for a "safe" alternative to religion-safe in the sense of being independent from particular religious traditions and therefore acceptable for inclusion in the public schools of pluralistic liberal democracies. These authors take spirituality to be universal where religion is particular, and so believe that introducing or reintroducing spirituality into public schools would not compromise liberal principles protecting individual autonomy and cultural diversity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it