Arquitectura y patrimonio “indígena”: museos nacionales de Canadá, Estados Unidos y México
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>Este artículo analiza los edificios que albergan tres instituciones arqueológicas y etnográficas de primer orden en tres países: el Museo Nacional de Antropología en la ciudad de México, concebido por Pedro Ramírez Vázquez (1964); el Canadian Museum of Civilization, en Ottawa/Gatineau, obra de Douglas Cardinal (1989); y el National Museum of the American Indian de Washington, D.C., proyectado también por el despacho de Cardinal (2004). La primera parte del texto describe aspectos arquitectónicos, curatoriales y museográficos de los tres museos. Posteriormente se presenta una interpretación patrimonial comparada de los tres recintos y sus respectivos acervos arqueológicos y etnográficos. Finalmente se comparan los riesgos conceptuales de la construcción de “patrimonios culturales indígenas”.</p><p> </p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it