MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2480725665 · doi:10.5334/gjgl.129

Velar palatalization in Slovenian: Local and long-distance interactions in a derived environment effect

2016· article· en· W2480725665 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Jurgec

Bibliographic record

VenueGlossa a journal of general linguistics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPhonetics and Phonology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObstruentConsonant clusterConsonantLinguisticsMathematicsSuffixVariation (astronomy)Computer scienceVoiceSpeech recognitionPhysicsVowelAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Slovenian velar palatalization has been described as a morphologically and lexically restricted, variable derived environment effect. This paper presents a corpus-based study that for the first time also considers synchronic phonological factors. Much of the variation turns out to be conditioned by local and long-distance consonant co-occurrence restrictions. In terms of local interactions, palatalization invariantly applies to remove an illicit consonant cluster while being blocked when it would result in an illicit consonant cluster. The more surprising finding is that other consonants within the stem also strongly affect palatalization. Palatalization of the stem-final velar is less likely if the stem contains another velar, and palatalization is categorically blocked if the stem contains a postalveolar obstruent, at any distance from the suffix. These data constitute a previously unreported type of local derived environment effects that are blocked at a distance. This interpretation of the Slovenian data sheds a new perspective on typologically similar patterns. The local and long-distance interactions found in Slovenian are modeled within the Maximum Entropy weighted constraint framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlossa a journal of general linguisticsSame topicPhonetics and Phonology ResearchFrench-language works237,207