MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2482342535 · doi:10.1109/mitp.2016.56

Electronic Commerce Meets the Semantic Web

2016· article· en· W2482342535 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIT Professional · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBig Data and Business Intelligence
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSemantic WebComputer scienceSocial Semantic WebE-commerceSemantic technologyWorld Wide WebWeb standardsData WebKnowledge managementThe InternetWeb service

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today's online retailers face many challenges, some of which are related to the efficient and effective integration, use, and maintenance of product and customer data. Technologies that make e-commerce data machine-comprehensible could help to overcome e-commerce data management challenges. Here, the authors look into the intersection of Semantic Web technologies and business-to-consumer (B2C) e-commerce, and explore the benefits that can be reaped by both online retailers and customers. The authors' systematic framework highlights why and how the adoption of Semantic Web technologies can enhance B2C applications and platforms. The framework is intended primarily for e-commerce decision makers and practitioners, to help them make more informed decisions on how to address e-commerce data management challenges using Semantic Web technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.491
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it