MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2483966489 · doi:10.1109/lca.2016.2597140

Stripes: Bit-Serial Deep Neural Network Computing

2016· article· en· W2483966489 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick Judd, Jorge Albericio, Andreas Moshovos

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Computer Architecture Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputationAccelerationArtificial neural networkOverhead (engineering)Representation (politics)Set (abstract data type)Computer engineeringEnergy (signal processing)AlgorithmDeep neural networksState (computer science)Power (physics)Hardware accelerationEfficient energy useArtificial intelligenceParallel computingComputer hardwareStatisticsMathematicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The numerical representation precision required by the computations performed by Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) varies across networks and between layers of a same network. This observation motivates a precision-based approach to acceleration which takes into account both the computational structure and the required numerical precision representation. This work presents Stripes (STR), a hardware accelerator that uses bit-serial computations to improve energy efficiency and performance. Experimental measurements over a set of state-ofthe-art DNNs for image classification show that STR improves performance over a state-of-the-art accelerator from 1.35x to 5.33x and by 2.24x on average. STR's area and power overhead are estimated at 5 percent and 12 percent respectively. STR is 2.00x more energy efficient than the baseline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Computer Architecture LettersSame topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207