MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2487400115 · doi:10.1353/see.2007.0104

The Czech Émigré Experience of Return after 1989

2007· article· en· W2487400115 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Slavonic and East European Review · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEastern European Communism and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsÉmigréCzechCommunismPoliticsDismissalPopulationSociologyLawEconomic historyPolitical scienceHistoryDemographyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SEER, Vol.85,No. i, Januay2007 The Czech Emigre Experience of Return after I989 MADELAINE HRON Here at home, we hold no love towards emigres. We didn't like them before, and we don't like them now. Not that we don't concern ourselves with them, we just simply really don't like them. Seemingly it's some kind of tradition here [...] They can go ahead and complain, but since they have no political rights,let them whine, they pose no threat, as long as at home all is quiet.' THIS comment by JirirBigas, made in his, I998 opinion column aptly titled 'The Relationship with One's Own Emigres is a Test of National Maturity', encapsulates some of the problematic perspectives on the return of Czech emigres after I989. Under the Communist regime of I948 to I989, an estimated 550,000 people, or 3.5 per cent of the population , emigrated from Czechoslovakia.2 After the Velvet Revolution, thousands of these emigres returned, with high hopes of returning 'home'. Now, fifteen years later, relatively few of these individuals remain in the Czech Republic; they have left again, disappointed by the disillusionment or discrimination they encountered. The negative attitude towards returning Czechs, ranging from dismissal to latent xenophobia, has been characterized as the 'anti-emigre trauma of Czech politics'.3 For a long time, Czechs were neither willing nor ready to express themselves on this sensitive issue. For example, Jirir Gruntorad, director of the samizdat archive Libri Prohibiti, saw himself as archiving painful memories which could not be adequately articulated in the contentious political climate of the i99os: Every generation has its trauma. Your mother remembered February [1948], your grandfather,the battle of Piava, and now we transmitstories of dissidents.I guessit doesn'tinterestpeople now, it irritatespeople. I have the feeling that it is unfitting,immoral even, to talk about it yet.4 Madelaine Hron is Assistant Professor in the Department of English and Film Studies at Wilfred Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario. 'Jirui Bigas, 'Vztah k vlastnim emigre"umje zkouskou narodni zralosti', Mladafrontadnes, 4 May I998, p. 7. (This and all subsequent translations are mine MH.) 2Jipi Pehe, 'Uprchlici v modernich ceskych dejinach', in UNHCR, UtMk a exil v umAnz, Prague, 2002, pp. 22-24 (p. 23). 3Milan Uhde, 'Vztahy mezi Cechy doma a Cechy v zahranici', Denni Telegraf,12 December I994, p. 3. 4Alena Jezkova, 'Mukl, kterej nekeca', Reflex,5 May I995, p. 28. 48 THE CZECH EMIGRE EXPERIENCE OF RETURN Almost a generationhas passed since the fall of Communism. Perhapsit is now time to addresssome of the contentiousissuesof recent historyand revisitthe traumaticsubjectof returningCzech emigres.Drawingon Czechopinionof the I99OSandthestatements of emigres,I willbrieflysketchoutthemainissuesoftheexperience ofthe emigrereturn.My analysishowever,will explorean aspectthat has been almostcompletelyoverlooked in thisdebate:literature, boththe literature ofexileandmorerecent'fictionofreturn'. I turntoliterature in order to better understandthe experienceof Czech emigres, beforeandafterI989, in itscomplexcultural, psychological andsociohistorical dimensions. Inparticular, I focuson the'painless' representation of the emigreexperienceby emigresthatlargelyinformedtheir receptionby Czechsin the CzechRepublicafterI989. I positthatthe suffering of emigrationand returnhas been repressed in Czechexile literatureand I examinethe effectsof this seemingabsenceof pain. Whathappenswhen the sufferingof emigrationis keptsilent?How doesone interpret the muteddistressin Czechexileliterature? When Czech emigrescould safelyreturnhome, was the hardshipof emigrationerased ?How did emigrewritersreturnhome in theirfiction? Thesearebutsomeofthequestions driving thisretrospective reflection. I. TheReturn oftheCzech Emigre Opustis-1i mne,nezahynu/opustis-li mne,zahynes.5 Shouldyou leaveme, I won'tperish/should you leaveme, youwilldie. This nationalist verseby VictorDyk is well knownby most Czechs. It represents the poetic politicalimaginationadoptedby the former CommunistCzechoslovak regime:MotherNation'swarningagainst emigration and exile. The explicit threat has acquired further resonanceafterthe fall of Communismin the contextof returning emigres. Until I999, commentators observedthat an 'undeclared war was beingwaged'6betweenCzech emigresand Czech citizens,a conflict thatwasreflectedeven in the highestpoliticalechelons.Forinstance, in I990, VaclavKlaus,laterpresident of theCzechRepublic(andthen chairmanof the Civic Forumparty),was askedaboutthe country's futurerelationship with Czech-Americans, and he reputedlyreplied: 'Czech-Americans annoyme'7('krajane mne zlobi').8In 1993, Peter Viktor Dyk, 'Zeme mluvi', in Milan Blahynka (ed.), Ceskd poeziedvacatAho stoleti,Prague, 1980, p. 69. 6 Thomas Pecina, 'When Czechs fight Czechs', CentralEuropeanReview, I9 July I999, [accessed January 2005] (hereafter, Pecina, 'When Czechs fight Czechs'). 7Petr Bisek, 'Are Czechs Outside of the Country Foreigners?' New Presence, 2, 2000, 3, P. 5 v Jaromir...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.586

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it