MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2488150157 · doi:10.2110/pec.08.90.0443

Fluvial to Estuarine Valley-Fill Models Without Age-Equivalent Sandy Shoreline Deposits, Based on the Clearwater Formation (Cretaceous) at Cold Lake, Alberta, Canada

2008· book-chapter· en· W2488150157 on OpenAlexaffabout
Howard R. Feldman, G. G. McCrimmon, T. A. de Freitas

Bibliographic record

VenueSEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology) eBooks · 2008
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsBP (Canada)Imperial Oil (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluvialCretaceousShoreGeologyEstuaryGeochemistryGeomorphologyPaleontologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A commonly assumed element of sequence stratigraphic theory is that incised valleys must feed lowstand deltas. This model persists despite examples in which no lowstand deposit is present at the distal ends of some ancient and recent valley fills. The Clearwater Formation at Cold Lake Field, Alberta, Canada, presents a unique opportunity to investigate in detail the transition from fluvial incised-valley fills to open marine mudstone using over 1000 wells, over 400 with core, from an area of 3,200 km2. The presence of prominent marine well-log markers and the abundance and density of well logs allows confident correlation of the incised-valley fills. The Clearwater Formation consists of 13 stacked incised valleys with depths of incision ranging from 30 m to possibly 120 m. All of the valley fills show a depositional facies pattern from sandy fluvial or upper estuarine updip to muddy estuarine or marine deposits downdip. All of the valleys terminate downdip as thin (< 2 m) sheets of marine sandy mudstone. Significantly, none of the valleys are connected to downdip lowstand deltas, or even sandy lowstand shorelines. In addition, the valley-fill lithofacies differ significantly from the marine strata into which they are incised; they are sandier, and the sand fraction is coarser. The valley fills, therefore, are not composed only of reworked material eroded from valley walls, but represent sediment delivered from more proximal sources, presumably by rivers. Our examples demonstrate that the presence of deep incised valleys, even if they are filled with coarse material, cannot by itself be used to predict sand delivery to the paleo-shoreline or more basinward regions. We recognize two primary conditions for valley fills that lack associated sandy lowstand deposits: the lowest point of relative sea level was above the continental shelf edge (for passive-margin settings), and sediment delivery during early rising sea level was limited. For the examples cited we interpret that filling of incised valleys occurs during relative sea-level rise when only limited amounts of sediment can be delivered beyond incised-valley mouths.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology) eBooksSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207