MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2492255794

From Buddhist philosophy to Evidence-Based Techniques: Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Programs and Student Self-Regulation in Canadian Schools

2016· article· en· W2492255794 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueISCHE 2016 · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMindfulnessBurnoutMindfulness-based stress reductionPsychologyGlobeDistressStress reductionMedical educationPedagogyClinical psychologyMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In March 2013, Andrew Campbell, a teacher at Major Ballachey Public School in Brantford, Ontario, wrote to the Toronto Globe and Mail about the mindfulness techniques he had introduced into his classroom.  In order to help students relax, learn to focus, concentrate and listen, Campbell would ring a bell, after which students sat quietly until the sound dissipated.  He then had students concentrate on breathing in and out with awareness. Campbell is hardly alone in giving voice to concerns about students’ emotional needs and classroom unrest. Only a month earlier the Toronto District School Board released the results of a survey of 100,000 students that found that almost three-quarters of those in grades 9 through 12 felt under significant stress all or some of the time [TDSB, 2013]. Students’ emotional distress has thus joined the more-recognized issue of teacher burnout as significant classroom issues. Given similar concerns throughout the English-speaking western world, educators have begun to turn to Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) and Self-Regulation programs.  Some teacher education programs have introduced courses in contemplative approaches while programs such as .b (dot-be) in England and MindUp in the US and Canada are being piloted in a variety of schools. The Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) program on which much of this activity is based was created in 1979 by Jon Kabat-Zinn at the University of Massachusetts Medical School. Used initially as a means to help patients with chronic pain, it has become one of the foremost treatments for individuals suffering from conditions such as depression, obsessive compulsive disorder, and anxiety [Kabat-Zinn, 2011].  Educators are also advocating its utility for the development of self-regulation [Lantieri; Shanker]. Focusing on developments in North America and Britain, this paper examines what MBSR is, where it came from, how it has spread and why it is gaining influence among educators. I argue that its current prominence is part of the broader thrust of psychology into school culture that has been occurring since the early twentieth century [Gleason, Rose, Thomson, Wright].  It is also, however, the more specific result of significant cultural and medical change since the 1960s, from the growing influence of Buddhist philosophy and alternative medicine, to new discoveries about the working of the brain, and changing attitudes towards discipline and authority. This paper would fit well under the category “Working, Thinking, Feeling Bodies.” The integration of MBSR in schools is about students learning to regulate themselves to calm their bodies and minds in order to contribute to a better learning environment (calm classrooms) and make themselves more effective learners (calm minds).  In controlling or even harnessing (rather than repressing) their emotions, the argument runs, students can become creative and productive citizens [Goleman; Schumpeter].  Examining the incorporation of MBSR-based programs into schools can thus help us better understand the ways in which new ideas about mental health are transforming our current education systems. Bibliography: Begley, Sharon. Train Your Mind, Change Your Brain: How a New science Reveals our Extraordinary Potential to Transform Ourselves . New York: Ballantine Books, 2008. Campbell, Andrew. “Breathe in, breathe out a way to conquer students’ stress,” Globe and Mail , 1 March 2013. Davidson, Richard and Sharon Begley.  The Emotional Life of Your Brain: How Its Unique Patterns Affect the Way You Think, Feel, and Live – and How You Can Change Them .  New York: Random House, 2012. Gleason, Mona. Normalizing the Ideal: Psychology, Schooling, and the Family in Post-war Canada . Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999. Goleman, Daniel.  Emotional Intelligence: Why it Can Matter More Than IQ .  10 th Ed. New York: Bantam Books, 2006. Kabat-Zinn, Jon. “Some Reflections on the Origins of MBSR, skillful Means, and the Trouble With Maps.” Contemporary Buddhism 12, 1 (May 2011): 289-90. Lantieri, Linda. Building Emotional Intelligence: Techniques to Cultivate Inner Strength in Children . Rose, Nikolas. Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood . Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Schumpeter.  “The mindfulness business.”  The Economist , 16 Nov. 2013, 73. Shanker, Stuart. Calm, Alert and Learning: Classroom Strategies for Self-Regulation. Toronto: Pearson, 2013. Thomson, Mathew.  Psychological Subjects: Identity, Culture, and Health in Twentieth-Century Britain . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006 Toronto District School Board (TDSB). “2011 Student Census, Grades 7-12: Previews.” 15/02/2013.  www.tdsb.on.ca/Portals/0/AboutUS/Research/2011StudentCensus.pdf. Wright, Katie.  The Rise of the Therapeutic Society .  Washington, D.C.: New Academia Publishing, 2011.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it