MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W249311954

What Does It Mean to Fight and to Win

2013· article· en· W249311954 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Deric Shannon

Bibliographic record

VenueAnarchist studies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Economy and Marxism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhirlwindUnrestPower (physics)SociologyMedia studiesReflexivityHistoryLawPolitical sciencePoliticsSocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Team Colors Collective, Uses of a Whirlwind: Movement, Movements, and Contemporary Radical Currents in the United States Oakland: AK Press, 2010, 420pp. ISBN 978-1-84935-016-7Turbulence Collective, What Would It Mean to Win? Oakland: PM Press, 2010, 128pp. ISBN 978-1-60486-110-5It's interesting to read these collections now - after Tahrir Square, Occupy Wall Street, Los Indignados, the Tottenham riots, the Quebecois and Chilean student uprisings, and so on. Both of these collections are broadly anti-capitalist reflections on movement, and so much has moved since they both were published. It is, perhaps, especially valuable to read them now and reconsider what we - as radicals - went into the current wave of global unrest with and what we might have learned in the midst of this global whirlwind.Uses of a Whirlwind is a collection on radical currents in the US specifically. It is a large collection and likely suffers a bit from its inclusiveness. I largely share the editors' desire to 'critique ... community organizing' the model centred 'on specific gains and getting those in power to bend to people's demands, working towards a delusionary and deeply limited goal of creating equal opportunity for everyone, rather than self-determination' (p.ll). In parts, I think the collection succeeds quite admirably at this (actually, both of these collections do). Much of it is written in the language of composition and recomposition - common signifiers among certain strands of Marxism - and those signifiers and concomitant analyses fit with their attempts to develop a reflexive and self-critical collection.It was interesting seeing this put to work by a collective member at Bluestockings bookstore in New York City. The idea of collectively-run businesses that circu- late commodities in the (capitalist) market being a part of radical movement is an interesting one. There have always been traditions in anarchism that stress self- management as some kind of panacea to solve the problems of capitalism (as if the problem of capital was simply one oi management). So instead of transforming society or envisioning something altogether different, we're encouraged to look at the existent and think of ways to run it ourselves: anarchists enamoured of co-ops, mutual credit associations and the like come to mind. In this interview, we're given a clear insight into the dangers of this kind of practice, as we are reminded that 'just because no structural position is left for a boss does not mean that we have not all internalized the boss in our modes of behavior and interaction' (p.23). It is also still commodity production and circulation and work as a separate and specialised sphere of life. I think this points to the need to take the disciplinary pressures of markets more seriously and rethink the role of self-management in radical theory and practice. One might pair this recognition of discipline as a political target with Benjamin Shepard's later chapter in the collection when he discusses 'queerness'.This is not to diminish the other pieces in the (same) section on 'Organization Case Studies'. The conversation between City Life/Vida Urbana, Picture the Homeless, Take Back the Land, and United Workers is particularly useful for people studying social movements and urbanity. And it is a sort of accidental prediction of things to come, especially the foreclosure resistance movements that have popped up in the wake of various Occupy encampments and the increase in actual occupations of buildings.I also appreciated the chapters on 1-69 resistance in Bloomington, Indiana (where organisers have been mobilising against the expansion of an interstate highway system that would uproot families, destroy forests, and decimate wetlands) and the Starbucks Workers Union. The 1-69 mobilisations demonstrate the need for our movements to take the biosphere into account and point to ways that Earth First! 'has grown to include a much wider perspective than that of an exclusively ecological ideology' (p. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.023
Scholarly communication0.0180.014
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnarchist studiesSame topicPolitical Economy and MarxismFrench-language works237,207