MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2493730065 · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2016.2566660

An Improved Oblique Projection Method for Sea Clutter Suppression in Shipborne HFSWR

2016· article· en· W2493730065 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadar Systems and Signal Processing
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsClutterDoppler effectOblique projectionAzimuthDoppler radarWeightingGeologyRadarProjection (relational algebra)Remote sensingFrequency domainRadar horizonAcousticsComputer scienceOrthographic projectionContinuous-wave radarRadar imagingOpticsPhysicsArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsAlgorithmComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sea clutter has a major impact on the detection performance of a shipborne high-frequency surface wave radar (HFSWR) system. Due to the platform motion of shipborne HFSWR, the Doppler spectrum of the first-order sea clutter suffers from some broadening so that the targets submerged in this broadening Doppler spectrum can be hardly detected. In this letter, an improved oblique projection (IOP) method, combining the oblique projection (OP) algorithm and the method of sea clutter suppression in the Doppler domain, is proposed to suppress sea clutter in both Doppler domain and spatial domain for shipborne HFSWR. Compared with the OP and the orthogonal weighting algorithms, the proposed IOP algorithm is shown to give far superior suppression results in the Doppler domain and can achieve better azimuth estimation results based on real data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it