MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2496194088 · doi:10.1109/acc.2016.7526062

Path-following control of an AUV using multi-objective model predictive control

2016· article· en· W2496194088 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel predictive controlFrame (networking)Path (computing)Task (project management)Remotely operated underwater vehicleControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceControl (management)Optimal controlFunction (biology)UnderwaterMotion planningMathematical optimizationControl engineeringMobile robotMathematicsEngineeringArtificial intelligenceRobot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The path-following (PF) problem of an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) is studied, in which the speed profile of the vehicle is taken into consideration as a secondary task. A multi-objective model predictive control (MO-MPC) framework is developed attempting to accommodate the prioritized tasks in PF. To solve the MO-MPC problem, we adopt the weighted sum method with the introduction of a logistic function that automatically selects the appropriate weights for each objective function. Pontryagin minimum principle (PMP) is subsequently applied for the implementation. Simulations using identified hydrodynamic coefficients of the Saab SeaEye Falcon open-frame ROV/AUV are carried out, which validates the effectiveness of the proposed MO-MPC path-following control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score0.696

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207