MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2497806130 · doi:10.1130/b31479.1

Structural relationships along a Neoarchean arc-continent collision zone, North China craton

2016· article· en· W2497806130 on OpenAlexaffabout
Junpeng Wang, Timothy Kusky, Lu Wang, Ali Polat, Hao Deng, Chen Wang, Songjie Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society of America Bulletin · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCratonGeologyArc (geometry)ChinaCollisionCollision zoneGeochemistryEarth scienceSeismologySubductionTectonicsGeometryGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| January 01, 2017 Structural relationships along a Neoarchean arc-continent collision zone, North China craton Junpeng Wang; Junpeng Wang 1State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, Center for Global Tectonics, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Timothy Kusky; Timothy Kusky † 1State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, Center for Global Tectonics, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China2Three Gorges Research Center for Geo-hazards, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China †Corresponding author: tkusky@gmail.com. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Lu Wang; Lu Wang 1State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, Center for Global Tectonics, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Ali Polat; Ali Polat 1State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, Center for Global Tectonics, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China3Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Hao Deng; Hao Deng 1State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, Center for Global Tectonics, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Chen Wang; Chen Wang 1State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, Center for Global Tectonics, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Songjie Wang Songjie Wang 1State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, Center for Global Tectonics, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Junpeng Wang 1State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, Center for Global Tectonics, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China Timothy Kusky † 1State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, Center for Global Tectonics, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China2Three Gorges Research Center for Geo-hazards, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China Lu Wang 1State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, Center for Global Tectonics, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China Ali Polat 1State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, Center for Global Tectonics, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China3Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada Hao Deng 1State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, Center for Global Tectonics, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China Chen Wang 1State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, Center for Global Tectonics, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China Songjie Wang 1State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, Center for Global Tectonics, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China †Corresponding author: tkusky@gmail.com. Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 28 Dec 2015 Revision Received: 13 Jun 2016 Accepted: 18 Jul 2016 First Online: 02 Jun 2017 Online Issn: 1943-2674 Print Issn: 0016-7606 © 2016 Geological Society of America GSA Bulletin (2017) 129 (1-2): 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1130/B31479.1 Article history Received: 28 Dec 2015 Revision Received: 13 Jun 2016 Accepted: 18 Jul 2016 First Online: 02 Jun 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Junpeng Wang, Timothy Kusky, Lu Wang, Ali Polat, Hao Deng, Chen Wang, Songjie Wang; Structural relationships along a Neoarchean arc-continent collision zone, North China craton. GSA Bulletin 2017;; 129 (1-2): 59–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/B31479.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Abstract The Archean North China craton is composed of the Western block, Eastern block, and the intervening Central orogenic belt. A 4–10-km-wide and 85-km-long tectonic mélange belt informally called the Zanhuang tectonic mélange is documented in the Zanhuang Massif of the Central orogenic belt, separating the Eastern block from an Archean arc terrane in the Central orogenic belt. The mélange belt contains a structurally complex tectonic mixture of metapelites, metapsammites, marbles, and quartzites mixed with exotic tectonic blocks of volcanic, mafic, and ultramafic rocks, metabasalts that locally include relict pillow structures, and tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG) gneisses. The Zanhuang tectonic mélange marks the suture of an arc-continent collisional zone between the Western Zanhuang Massif in the Central orogenic belt and the Eastern block of the North China craton, and it is one of the best-preserved Archean tectonic mélanges in the world. Here, using zircon U-Pb dating of various types of blocks from the Zanhuang mélange, we show that the formation and associated deformation of the Zanhuang mélange occurred in the Neoarchean (ca. 2.5 Ga). High-precision (1:20–1:200) lithostructural mapping of three key outcrops reveals details of the internal fabrics and kinematics of the mélange and regional structural relationships along the arc-continent collisional zone. A synthesis of studies on the tectonic evolution of the North China craton, coupled with our new fabric and kinematic analysis of the Zanhuang mélange, further constrains the initial amalgamation timing and geometry of the arc-continent collision between the Fuping arc terrane in the Central orogenic belt and the Eastern block with a northwest-dipping subduction polarity. The asymmetric structures and mixture of different blocks and matrices with folding and thrusting events in the Zanhuang mélange record kinematic information that is consistent with the tectonic setting of an accretionary wedge that was thrust over the passive margin of the Eastern block by 2.5 Ga. Lithostructural mapping shows that the classic mélange and fold-and-thrust structures along the Neoarchean arc-continent collisional zone are broadly similar to Phanerozoic collisional belts. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score0.624

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society of America BulletinSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207