MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modeling Multi-State Equipment Degradation with Non-Homogeneous Continuous-Time Hidden Semi-Markov Process

2012· book-chapter· en· W2500605685 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIGI Global eBooks · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReliability and Maintenance Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReliability (semiconductor)Reliability engineeringProcess (computing)Markov processDomain (mathematical analysis)Computer scienceState (computer science)Time domainDegradation (telecommunications)Stochastic processCondition monitoringMarkov chainCondition-based maintenanceEngineeringMathematicsMachine learningAlgorithmStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The multi-state reliability analysis has received great attention recently in the domain of reliability and maintenance, specifically for mechanical equipment operating under stress, load, and fatigue conditions. The overall performance of this type of mechanical equipment deteriorates over time, which may result in multi-state health conditions. This deterioration can be represented by a continuous-time degradation process with multiple discrete states. In reality, due to technical problems, directly observing the actual health condition of the equipment may not be possible. In such cases, condition monitoring information may be useful to estimate the actual health condition of the equipment. In this chapter, the authors describe the application of a general stochastic process to multi-state equipment modeling. Also, an unsupervised learning method is presented to estimate the parameters of this stochastic model from condition monitoring data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it