MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2504337894 · doi:10.1002/sec.1456

Two new message authentication codes based on APN functions and stream ciphers

2016· article· en· W2504337894 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSecurity and Communication Networks · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMessage authentication codeAuthentication (law)Stream cipherCode (set theory)Data Authentication AlgorithmCBC-MACTheoretical computer scienceComputer securityHash-based message authentication codeBlock cipherComputer networkAuthentication protocolCryptographyProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract After the concept of the active wiretapper was proposed, integrity protection became more important than ever before. Therefore, message authentication code, a method that protects the message from being modified in an undetectable way, attracts more attention nowadays. In this paper, we propose two new message authentication codes based on almost perfect nonlinear functions and stream ciphers. The security of both new constructions is proved by giving upper bounds of the probability of the successful substitution forgery attacks against our new message authentication codes, and these upper bounds are negligible. We implement our algorithms and compare their time consumption with the time consumption of EIA1, the message authentication code used in the 4G LTE system. The results show that our algorithms are overwhelmingly faster than EIA1. Moreover, our new constructions are resistant to cycling and linear forgery attacks, which can be applied to EIA1. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it