MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2506679077 · doi:10.2118/180649-ms

Advanced Dynamic Drillstring Modeling Delivers Efficient Underreaming and Rathole Elimination Solutions

2016· article· en· W2506679077 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCasingDrillingFinite element methodPetroleum engineeringVibrationMechanical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringStructural engineeringAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract While planning a wildcat exploration well, an operator faced formation depth uncertainty as a result of poor seismic imaging as well as limited offset pore pressure and fracture pressure data. A steep pressure ramp was anticipated at some depth below surface casing, and casing design included a 16-in liner to secure this interval. To properly evaluate and understand the lithology and pressure while drilling would require high-quality LWD data, but it was also essential that the liner and casing could be fully run to the bottom of the hole. Underreaming near the bit while drilling would compromise the LWD data, but underreaming above the LWD tools would not enable the casing to be fully run to bottom. Two hole-enlargement-while-drilling (HEWD) BHAs with the option for rathole elimination (RHE) were proposed and enabled these objectives to be efficiently achieved without compromise. A combined HEWD and RHE BHA is not new in the industry, but it is challenging in large hole sizes. With multiple cutting structures in the BHA, drillstring dynamics become complex. The resultant vibration and shock can lead to diminished drilling performance, or even failure of BHA components. A prejob finite-element analysis (FEA) modeling simulation was used to investigate the dynamic drilling behavior of the initially-planned BHAs. The simulation results from initial BHA design predicted high vibrations. A BHA optimization analysis was then conducted to determine the most favorable BHA configuration for effective LWD tool placement and minimized vibration issues, taking into account the BHA geometry and stabilization points, cutting structures, and formation type. The simulation results from the final BHA exhibited a significant reduction in shock and vibration levels. Suitable drilling parameters were identified, and hydraulics simulations were performed to ensure that both the HEWD and RHE underreamers could be reliably actuated. The operator implemented the recommended BHAs, cutting structures, and parameter roadmaps on both the 17-in × 20-in and 14¾-in × 17½-in sections, and the solution successfully drilled 501-m and 605-m intervals, respectively. Each interval was drilled and enlarged in a single trip. Both HEWD BHAs exhibited low levels of vibration during the original underreaming, enabling quality LWD data to be obtained. After maximizing section depth, the HEWD underreamer was deactivated and the RHE underreamer activated, enabling the rathole to be underreamed and subsequently the liner and casing strings run fully to the bottom of the hole. Advanced dynamic drillstring modeling can simulate downhole drilling conditions, enabling improved prejob planning and thus more efficient drilling operations. Proper design of HEWD and RHE BHAs can help the operator efficiently maximize the quality of LWD data while drilling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.773
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it