MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2507993224 · doi:10.21611/qirt.2010.038

Near infrared imaging for multi-polar civilian applications

2010· article· en· W2507993224 on OpenAlexaff
A. Ebeid, S. Rott, E. Talmy, Clemente Ibarra‐Castanedo, A. Bendada, Xavier Maldague

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Quantitative InfraRed Thermography · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrared Target Detection Methodologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfraredPolarRemote sensingOptical imagingComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceGeologyOpticsPhysicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infrared can be referred to any type of invisible electromagnetic spectrum having radiation wavelengths above the visible band and below the microwave band.We can define the near-infrared (NIR-approximately from 0.78 to 2.2 µm) as the band located between the visible and the mid-wave infrared (MWIR approximately from 3 to 5 µm).Nowadays, there are many applications where the NIR band is used.Some of them are biometrics, face recognition, surveillance and security, and biotechnology, among many others.In this paper, we present some of these applications using two NIR cameras: (1) a highend scientific CMOS camera made by Goodrich (0.9 to 1.7 µm); and (2) a standard CCD camera made by Mutech (Phoenix model) (0.75 to 1.1 µm) from which the NIR spectral filter has been removed to allow NIR radiation measurement.We have used both transmission and reflection modes to acquire the NIR data.A set of narrow-band spectral filters in order to optimize the signal for multispectral analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Quantitative InfraRed ThermographySame topicInfrared Target Detection MethodologiesFrench-language works237,207