MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2507993224 · doi:10.21611/qirt.2010.038

Near infrared imaging for multi-polar civilian applications

2010· article· en· W2507993224 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Quantitative InfraRed Thermography · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrared Target Detection Methodologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfraredPolarRemote sensingOptical imagingComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceGeologyOpticsPhysicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infrared can be referred to any type of invisible electromagnetic spectrum having radiation wavelengths above the visible band and below the microwave band. We can define the near-infrared (NIR-approximately from 0.78 to 2.2 m) as the band located between the visible and the mid-wave infrared (MWIR approximately from 3 to 5 m).Nowadays, there are many applications where the NIR band is used. Some of them are biometrics, face recognition, surveillance and security, and biotechnology, among many others. In this paper, we present some of these applications using two NIR cameras: (1) a highend scientific CMOS camera made by Goodrich (0.9 to 1.7 m); and (2) a standard CCD camera made by Mutech (Phoenix model) (0.75 to 1.1 m) from which the NIR spectral filter has been removed to allow NIR radiation measurement. We have used both transmission and reflection modes to acquire the NIR data. A set of narrow-band spectral filters in order to optimize the signal for multispectral analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.319
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it