MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2508429587 · doi:10.1061/9780784480144.014

Estimation of Landfill Methane Emissions Using Stochastic Search

2016· article· en· W2508429587 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeo-Chicago 2016 · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandfill Environmental Impact Studies
Canadian institutionsNuclear Waste Management Organization
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethaneMethane emissionsEnvironmental scienceMunicipal solid wasteAtmospheric dispersion modelingDispersion (optics)Environmental engineeringLandfill gasGreenhouse gasAtmospheric methaneWaste managementAir pollutionEngineeringChemistryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills can generate significant amounts of methane. There is considerable interest in quantifying surface methane emissions at such facilities. Numerous techniques exist for the evaluation of methane emissions from landfills. These techniques are either based on analytical emission models or on measurement methods. This paper presents a method to estimate methane emissions using ambient air methane measurements obtained on the surface of a landfill. Genetic algorithms (GA) based optimization combined with the standard Gaussian dispersion model are employed to identify locations as well as emission rates of potential emission sources throughout a MSW landfill. A case study is employed to evaluate the performance of the proposed methodology. GA-based search techniques are proven to be useful in estimating source locations and emission rates using methane concentration measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it