MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2508616049 · doi:10.1177/0008068320090101

Some Comments on the Watson Efficiency of the Ordinary Least Squares Estimator Under the Gauss Markov Model

2009· article· en· W2508616049 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCalcutta Statistical Association Bulletin · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsEstimatorApplied mathematicsOrdinary least squaresWatsonParametric statisticsEfficient estimatorFunction (biology)Best linear unbiased predictionStatisticsMinimum-variance unbiased estimatorComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the estimation of a given estimable parametric function in the Gauss–Markov model, and focus on questions concerning the Watson efficiency of the ordinary least squares estimator (OLSE) of the given parametric function with respect to the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE). We apply the Frisch–Waugh–Lovell Theorem for the estimation of the parametric function, and give an interesting decomposition of the total Watson efficiency with respect to the efficiency of the parametric function. Also, a relation between the Watson efficiency of the OLSE of the given parametric function and specific canonical correlations is established.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score0.861

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it