Classifying Crystal Structures of Binary Compounds AB through Cluster Resolution Feature Selection and Support Vector Machine Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and support vector machine (SVM) techniques were applied to develop a crystal structure predictor for binary AB compounds. Models were trained and validated on the basis of the classification of 706 AB compounds adopting the seven most common structure types (CsCl, NaCl, ZnS, CuAu, TlI, β-FeB, and NiAs), through data extracted from Pearson’s Crystal Data and ASM Alloy Phase Diagram Database. Out of 56 initial variables (descriptors based on elemental properties only), 31 were selected in as unbiased manner as possible through a procedure of forward selection and backward elimination, with the quality of the model evaluated by measuring the cluster resolution at each step. PLS-DA gave sensitivity of 96.5%, specificity of 66.0%, and accuracy of 77.1% for the validation set data, whereas SVM gave sensitivity of 94.2%, specificity of 92.7%, and accuracy of 93.2%, a significant improvement. Radii, electronegativity, and valence electrons, previously chosen intuitively in structure maps, were confirmed as important variables. PLS-DA and SVM could also make quantitative predictions of hypothetical compounds, unlike semiclassical approaches. The new compound RhCd was predicted to have the CsCl-type structure by PLS-DA (0.669 probability) and, at an even stronger confidence level, by SVM (0.918 probability). RhCd was synthesized by reaction of the elements at 800 °C and confirmed by X-ray diffraction to adopt the CsCl-type structure. SVM is thus a superior classification method in crystallography that is fast and makes correct, quantitative predictions; it may be more broadly applicable to help identify the structure of unknown compounds with any arbitrary composition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".