MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2510425411 · doi:10.1002/ppap.201600099

Energetics of reactions in a dielectric barrier discharge with argon carrier gas: IV ethyl lactate

2016· article· en· W2510425411 on OpenAlexafffund
Bernard Nisol, Sean Watson, Sophie Lerouge, M. R. Wertheimer

Bibliographic record

VenuePlasma Processes and Polymers · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlasma Applications and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPlasma-enhanced chemical vapor depositionArgonDielectric barrier dischargeMonomerMoleculeDielectricPlasma polymerizationChemistryAqueous solutionPlasmaAtmospheric pressureChemical vapor depositionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceChemical engineeringOrganic chemistryPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report dielectric barrier discharge (DBD)‐based atmospheric pressure (AP) plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) experiments using argon carrier gas and ethyl lactate (EL) as the precursor molecule (“monomer”). As in our preceding research with other monomers, unprecedented precision and reproducibility is again demonstrated, here to create plasma polymerized (PP‐EL) deposits. PP‐EL is thought to be an excellent candidate for bio‐medical applications on account of the non‐toxic nature of resulting PP‐EL deposits. We have shown that a narrow range of energy values absorbed from the plasma, Em, between roughly 21 and 42 eV/molecule, lead to PP‐EL coatings of widely varying structural and physical properties, ones with controlled retention of chemical features of the EL monomer, and a predictable rate of degradation in aqueous media.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlasma Processes and PolymersSame topicPlasma Applications and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207