MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2511272914 · doi:10.1109/tcds.2016.2604375

Selective Attention by Perceptual Filtering in a Robot Control Architecture

2016· article· en· W2511272914 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologiqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceArchitecturePerceptionRobotHuman–computer interactionArtificial intelligenceCognitive architectureControl (management)Robot controlMobile robotCognitionPsychologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern autonomous robots must integrate multiple perceptual and behavioral modalities to be useful in our daily lives. Such integration is constrained by the limited onboard computing capacity of robotic platforms. To alleviate this issue, perceptual filtering, a selective attention mechanism, can be used to efficiently manage computing resources based on what the robot has to accomplish. This paper describes our implementation of perceptual filtering in a robot control architecture, implemented using robot operating system (ROS), and how it can dynamically optimize the use of the computing resources available on the robot. Our perceptual filtering mechanism is demonstrated and validated using a mobile humanoid platform integrating autonomous and teleoperated navigation, QR code recognition, face recognition, and sound localization capabilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it