MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2511516987 · doi:10.1061/9780784480151.027

Effect of Temperatures on the Dynamic Properties of Asphaltic Core for an Earth Dam

2016· article· en· W2511516987 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeo-Chicago 2016 · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsGolder Associates (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShear modulusGeotechnical engineeringOverburden pressureShear (geology)Materials scienceCore (optical fiber)LeveeAsphaltComposite materialGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asphaltic concrete has been used as impervious core in embankment dams because it can be built quickly and efficiently even in areas with high precipitation in contrast to embankment dam with clay or till cores. In this study, a series of resonant column tests were conducted on asphaltic concrete samples to investigate the effects of temperature on dynamic properties for different confining pressures. Samples were tested at the temperatures of 0, 5, 10, 15, and 22°C. Technique used to conduct temperature controlled testing in resonant column test is presented. Resonant column testing at each temperature was performed at three confining pressure of 50, 150, and 350 kPa. Effect of confining pressure variation on dynamic properties of asphaltic concrete samples is negligible. However, shear modulus and shear wave velocity change significantly as a function of temperature; For instance, as the temperature increases from 0 to 22°C, the shear modulus and shear wave velocity decrease approximately 25% and 13%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it