Semi-Online Algorithms for Computational Task Offloading with Communication Delay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study the scheduling of computational tasks on one local processor and one remote processor with communication delay. This problem has important application in cloud computing. Although the communication time to transmit a task can be inferred from the known data size of the task and the transmission bandwidth, the processing time of the task is generally unknown until it is processed to completion. Given a set of independent tasks with unknown processing times, our objective is to minimize makespan. We study the problem under two scenarios: (1) the communication times of the tasks to the remote processor are smaller than their corresponding processing times on the remote processor, and (2) the communication times of the tasks to the remote processor are larger than their corresponding processing times on the remote processor. For the first scenario we propose the Semi-online Partitioning and Communication (SPaC) algorithm, and for the second scenario we propose the SPaC-Restart (SPaC-R) algorithm. Even though the offline version of this problem, with a priori known processing times, is NP-hard, we show that the proposed semionline algorithms achieve O(1) competitive ratios for their intended scenarios. We also provide competitive ratios for both algorithms for more general communication times. We use simulation to demonstrate that SPaC and SPaC-R outperform online list scheduling and performs comparably well with the best known offline heuristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".