Semi-Online Algorithms for Computational Task Offloading with Communication Delay
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study the scheduling of computational tasks on one local processor and one remote processor with communication delay. This problem has important application in cloud computing. Although the communication time to transmit a task can be inferred from the known data size of the task and the transmission bandwidth, the processing time of the task is generally unknown until it is processed to completion. Given a set of independent tasks with unknown processing times, our objective is to minimize makespan. We study the problem under two scenarios: (1) the communication times of the tasks to the remote processor are smaller than their corresponding processing times on the remote processor, and (2) the communication times of the tasks to the remote processor are larger than their corresponding processing times on the remote processor. For the first scenario we propose the Semi-online Partitioning and Communication (SPaC) algorithm, and for the second scenario we propose the SPaC-Restart (SPaC-R) algorithm. Even though the offline version of this problem, with a priori known processing times, is NP-hard, we show that the proposed semionline algorithms achieve O(1) competitive ratios for their intended scenarios. We also provide competitive ratios for both algorithms for more general communication times. We use simulation to demonstrate that SPaC and SPaC-R outperform online list scheduling and performs comparably well with the best known offline heuristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it