MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2516209658 · doi:10.1089/thy.2016.0064

Management of Invasive Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

2016· review· en· W2516209658 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThyroid · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsMedicineThyroid cancerEsophagusPapillary thyroid cancerThyroidDiseaseCancerSubmucosaStage (stratigraphy)SurgeryRadiologyPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Invasive disease is a poor prognostic factor for patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Uncontrolled central neck disease is a common cause of distressing death for patients presenting in this manner. Advances in assessment and management of such cases have led to significant improvements in outcome for this patient group. This article reviews the patterns of invasion and a contemporary approach to investigation and treatment of patients with invasive DTC. SUMMARY: Aerodigestive tract invasion is reported in around 10% of case series of DTC. Assessment should include not only clinical history and physical examination with endoscopy as indicated, but ultrasound and contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging. Further studies including positron emission tomography should be considered, particularly in recurrent cases that are radioactive iodine (RAI) resistant. Both the patient and the extent of disease should be carefully assessed prior to embarking on surgery. The aim of surgery is to resect all gross disease. When minimal visceral invasion is encountered early, "shave" procedures are recommended. In the setting of transmural invasion of the airway or esophagus, however, full thickness excision is required. For intermediate cases in which invasion of the viscera has penetrated the superficial layers but is not evident in the submucosa, opinion is divided. Early reports recommended an aggressive approach. More recently authors have tended to recommend less aggressive resections with postoperative adjuvant therapies. The role of external beam radiotherapy continues to evolve in DTC with support for its use in patients considered to have RAI-resistant tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with invasive DTC require a multidisciplinary approach to investigation and treatment. With detailed assessment, appropriate surgery, and adjuvant therapy when indicated, this patient group can expect durable control of central neck disease, despite the aggressive nature of their primary tumors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it