MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2517869259 · doi:10.1002/elan.201600349

A Two‐step Strategy for the Selective and Sensitive Detection of Dopamine with Glassy Carbon Electrodes

2016· article· en· W2517869259 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectroanalysis · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrochemical sensors and biosensors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAscorbic acidGlassy carbonElectrodeAnalyteCyclic voltammetryDopamineRedoxCarbon fibersAnodeDetection limitElectrochemistryChemistryMaterials scienceVoltammetryInorganic chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyPhysical chemistryComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A new strategy is developed for using cyclic voltammetry technique to achieve sensitive and selective detection of dopamine on glassy carbon electrodes. The proposed method involves two steps, in which the cyclic voltammetric measurement is preceded by a brief period of potentiostatic treatment of the analyte solution. With this two‐step strategy redox peaks could be seen at dopamine concentration as low as 5 μM. In the co‐presence of ascorbic acid and uric acid, there are three well‐resolved anodic peaks with the peak separation between ascorbic acid and dopamine larger than 230 mV. The fact that no pre‐modification of the glassy carbon electrode is needed and the glassy carbon electrodes can be readily recovered after each measurement makes this new method attractive for the sensitive detection of dopamine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it