MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2517982900

On Egg-laying Times of American Robins

2024· article· W2517982900 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZoologyBiologyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent paper by Weatherhead et al. (1991) added to our knowledge of the laying hour of the American Robin (Turdus migratorius) and contains stimulating speculations about the evolution of laying times.Unfortunately, the paper was incomplete in that no reference was made to previous studies of egg laying by American Robins.These studies, although individually based on small samples, collectively comprised about 30 observations of laying by at least 10 females and were consistent with each other.These observations foreshadowed some of the results and conclusions presented by Weatherhead et al.For example, it was first noted almost a century ago that American Robins do not lay in the early morning.Each of eight earlier references on laying by robins agrees on that point; in one paper (Howe 1898), the abbreviations A.M. and P.M. seem to have been transposed.Otherwise, the records indicate that American Robins lay late in the morning and even in the afternoon.As I believe that the earlier contri-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.415
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it