MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2521761739 · doi:10.1021/cen-v080n042.p020

STOCKS HIT HARD IN THIRD QUARTER

2002· article· en· W2521761739 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical & Engineering News · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
Topicscientometrics and bibliometrics research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationQuarter (Canadian coin)Social mediaIconComputer scienceLibrary scienceInformation retrievalWorld Wide WebHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TRENDS — CORPORATE SCANDALS, poor earnings, and a lack of confidence in the economy—that began battering stock markets in the second quarter continued unabated in the third. The Dow Jones industrial average hit a new five-year low while the technology-heavy NASDAQ was reminiscent of 1997 levels. Stocks for chemical, drug, and biopharmaceutical producers were not immune, but in some cases they did better than the broader markets. Chemical stocks continued their downward slide in the third quarter. C&EN's chemical stock index, calculated from the daily average stock prices of 25 leading companies, fell 175% from the last trading day of the second quarter to end the July-to-September period at 133 (1992 = 100). This percentage decline almost matched the 17.9% drop in the Dow Jones average during the same period. However, the chemical index ended the quarter just 14.0% below where it closed out 2001, while the Dow Jones, in contrast, closed down 24.2%. The ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Bibliometrics, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesBibliometrics
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0140.056
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.371
GPT teacher head0.456
Teacher spread0.085 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it