Educating patients about Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy: Perceptions among treatment seekers and non-treatment seekers before and after viewing an educational video
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT) is an efficacious, yet novel approach to the treatment of depression and anxiety. It has the potential to improve access to evidenced-based care, but only if potential patients are aware of, understand, and have positive expectations about this treatment. In order to establish whether the use of an educational video could improve favourable expectations of ICBT, two studies were conducted. The goal of the first study was to determine whether an educational video would improve perceptions of ICBT among individuals seeking ICBT treatment and to determine what type of information (client testimonials versus statistical information related to outcomes) facilitates the greatest increase in positive expectations of ICBT. Participants who visited an ICBT service (N = 71) website were invited to first complete brief questionnaires assessing initial perceptions of ICBT. They were then randomly assigned to watch one of two videos containing either client testimonials (n = 32) or statistical information related to outcomes (n = 39). Patient perceptions of ICBT were then reassessed. Perceptions of ICBT were significantly higher post-video than pre-video and the type of information did not impact perceptions of ICBT. In the second study, the research was extended by examining perceptions of ICBT before and after watching an educational video (including both statistical and narrative information as this had no impact on perceptions) in a sample of individuals (N = 94) who were experiencing anxiety and depression but were not specifically seeking ICBT. As with treatment seekers, perceptions of ICBT were significantly higher post-video than pre-video. Comparison of the treatment and non-treatment seekers revealed no differences in perceptions of ICBT between the samples. The findings suggest that educational videos are an effective way to increase expectations of ICBT. Future directions for research are described.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".