MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2524681397 · doi:10.1109/aim.2016.7576742

Optimal preview control of the Nao biped robot using a UKF-based state observer

2016· article· en· W2524681397 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Locomotion and Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Inverted pendulumKalman filterZero moment pointRobustness (evolution)EstimatorCovarianceComputer scienceObserver (physics)KinematicsController (irrigation)Moment (physics)Alpha beta filterMathematicsRobotExtended Kalman filterHumanoid robotArtificial intelligenceMoving horizon estimationControl (management)Nonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an optimal preview controller for the Nao biped robot is developed based on a three-dimensional linear inverted pendulum model and zero moment point stability criterion. In order to estimate the unmeasurable state vector, an unscented Kalman filter state observer is proposed which guarantees robustness of the control loop through loop transfer recovery and provides asymptotic stability of the error covariance. This approach necessitates developing and utilizing forward and inverse kinematic analysis. Inverse kinematic relations are employed within the controller as an estimator of joint angles given positions of the zero moment point and center of mass trajectories. The results show effectiveness of the proposed preview controller and the observer scheme to achieve a stable walk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Locomotion and ControlFrench-language works237,207