Acceleration of k-Means Algorithm Using Altera SDK for OpenCL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A K-means clustering algorithm involves partitioning of data iteratively into k clusters. It is one of the most popular data-mining algorithms [Wu et al. 2007], and is widely used in other applications, such as image processing and machine learning. However, k-means is highly time-consuming when data or cluster size is large. Traditionally, FPGAs have shown great promise for accelerating computationally intensive algorithms, but they are harder to use for acceleration if we rely on traditional HD-based design methods. The recent introduction of Altera SDK for the OpenCL high-level synthesis tool allows developers to utilize FPGA's potential without long development periods and extensive hardware knowledge. This article presents an optimized implementation of a k-means clustering algorithm on an FPGA using Altera SDK for OpenCL. Performance and power consumption is measured with various data, cluster, and dimension sizes. When compared to state-of-the-art solutions, this implementation supports larger cluster sizes, offers up to 21x speed over a CPU and is more power efficient than a GPU. Unlike previous implementations, it can deliver consistently high throughput across large or small feature dimensions given reasonable cluster sizes and large enough data size.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".