MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2524958634 · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2016.2566680

Solving the Group Multirole Assignment Problem by Improving the ILOG Approach

2016· article· en· W2524958634 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Agent-Based Network Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooNipissing University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNipissing University
KeywordsComputer scienceTask (project management)IBMMathematical optimizationAssignment problemGroup (periodic table)Optimization problemProcess (computing)AlgorithmMathematicsEngineeringChemistrySystems engineeringProgramming languageOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Role assignment is a critical element in the role-based collaboration process. There are many different requirements to be considered when undertaking this task. This correspondence paper formalizes the group multirole assignment (GMRA) problem; proves the necessary and sufficient condition for the problem to have a feasible solution, provides an improved IBM ILOG CPLEX optimization package solution, and verifies the proposed solution with experiments. The contributions of this paper include: 1) the formalization of an important engineering problem, i.e., the GMRA problem; 2) a theoretical proof of the necessary and sufficient condition for GMRA to have a feasible solution; and 3) an improved ILOG solution to such a problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.755

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it