MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2524967657 · doi:10.1177/0885328216672088

Antibacterial and osteo-stimulatory effects of a borate-based glass series doped with strontium ions

2016· article· en· W2524967657 on OpenAlexafffund
Yiming Li, Wendy Stone, Emil H. Schemitsch, Paul Zalzal, M. Papini, Stephen D. Waldman, Mark R. Towler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomaterials Applications · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsOakville-Trafalgar Memorial HospitalToronto Metropolitan UniversitySt. Michael's Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsStrontiumSolubilityDissolutionNuclear chemistryAmorphous solidSimulated body fluidMaterials scienceMineralogyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryApatiteChromatographyCrystallographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work considered the effect of both increasing additions of Strontium (Sr 2+ ) and incubation time on solubility and both antibacterial and osteo-stimulatory effects of a series of glasses based on the B 2 O 3 –P 2 O 5 –CaCO 3 –Na 2 CO 3 –TiO 2 –SrCO 3 series. The amorphous nature of all the glasses was confirmed by X-ray diffraction. Discs of each glass were immersed in de-ionized water for 1, 7 and 30 days, and the water extracts were used for ion release profiles, pH measurements and cytotoxicity testing. Atomic absorption spectroscopy was employed to detect the release of Na + , Ca 2+ and Sr 2+ ions from the glasses with respect to maturation, which indicated that the addition of Sr 2+ retarded solubility of the glass series. This effect was also confirmed by weight loss analysis through comparing the initial weight of glass discs before and after periods of incubation. The incorporation of Sr 2+ in the glasses did not influence the pH of the water extracts when the glasses were stored for up to 30 days. Cytotoxicity testing with an osteoblastic cell line (MC3T3-E1) indicated that glasses with the higher (20 mol% and 25 mol%) Sr 2+ incorporation promoted proliferation of osteoblast cells, while the glasses with lower Sr 2+ contents inhibited cell growth. The glass series, except for Ly-B5 (which contained the highest Sr 2+ incorporation; 25 mol%), were bacteriostatic against S. aureus in the short term (1–7 days) as a result of the dissolution products released.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biomaterials ApplicationsSame topicBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsFrench-language works237,207