Extreme learning machine for 60 GHz millimetre wave positioning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Extreme learning machine (ELM) has attracted considerable attention in recent years due to its numerous applications in classification and regression. In this study, the authors investigate the performance of an ELM‐based threshold selection algorithm for 60 GHz millimetre wave time of arrival estimation using energy detector (ED). A hybrid metric based on the skewness, kurtosis, standard deviation, and slope of the ED values is employed. The optimal normalised threshold for different signal‐to‐noise ratios (SNRs) is investigated, and the effects of the integration period and channel model are examined. Performance results are presented which show that the proposed ELM‐based algorithm provides high precision and better robustness than existing techniques over a wide range of SNRs for the IEEE 802.15.3c CM1.1 and CM2.1 channel models. Further, the performance is largely independent of the integration period and channel model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it