The Role of Advertisements in Protection of Consumer’s Right of Choice
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Consumer’s right of choice is the most important one of his rights. Protecting it during the period before conclusion of contract can predispose the creation of a stable legal relationship which is in conformity with the real will and purpose of the consumer. Category of advertisement is one of the most important factors that have a strong impact on the consumer’s choice. True advertisements which are in conformity with realities make the consumers evaluate selection options for purchasing or using the advertised goods or services and decide according to it and without spending time and cost. However, untrue advertisements will have a reverse role with reflection of untrue affairs. Therefore, the role of advertisements and its effectiveness on consumer’s right of choice are from the undeniable realities. That is why the organization of advertisements affair to protect Consumer’s right of choice is a necessity that different legal systems have responded to it. In this research, the legal systems of Iran and Britain have been studied in a descriptive and comparative method. So that a step to be taken to remove legal defects and deficiencies while recognizing the legal status and consumer protective tools in Iran law.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it