MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Accelerating linear solvers for reservoir simulation on GPU workstations

2016· article· en· W2527835641 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpeedupComputer scienceParallel computingMultigrid methodKrylov subspaceXeonWorkstationLinear systemGraphics processing unitComputational scienceLinear algebraGraphicsXeon PhiAlgorithmIterative methodComputer graphics (images)MathematicsOperating systemPartial differential equation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The solvers for solving large-scale linear systems occupy a crucial part of a reservoir simulator. We have studied linear solvers on GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) workstations. ILU(k) preconditioned Krylov subspace linear solvers have been completed and over 20 times speedup can be achieved on a four NVIDIA Tesla C2050/C2070 GPU workstation against a Intel Xeon X5570 CPU. Algebraic multigrid solvers with a group of smoothers are also implemented and the W-cycle, F-cycle and V-cycle are studied. Up to 7 times speedup of algebraic multigrid algorithms is obtained on single GPU. The solution time of large-scale linear systems can be shortened significantly based on our GPU-based linear solvers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.299
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it