MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2528650285 · doi:10.1109/iiswc.2016.7581265

Characterizing the workload of a netflix streaming video server

2016· article· en· W2528650285 on OpenAlexafffund
Jim Summers, Tim Brecht, Derek L. Eager, Alex Gutarin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsComputer scienceSession (web analytics)ServerWorkloadComputer networkInstruction prefetchService (business)The InternetLocalityMultimediaOperating systemWorld Wide WebCache

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we characterize the workload of a Netflix streaming video web server. Netflix is a widely popular subscription service with over 81 million global subscribers [24]. The service streams professionally produced TV shows and movies over the Internet to an extremely diverse and representative set of playback devices over broadband, DSL, WiFi and cellular connections. Characterizing this type of workload is an important step to understanding and optimizing the performance of the servers used to support the growing number of streaming video services. We focus on the HTTP requests observed at the server from Netflix client devices by analyzing anonymized log files obtained from a server containing a portion of the Netflix catalog. We introduce the notion of chains of sequential requests to represent the spatial locality of the workload and find that despite servicing clients that adapt to changes in network and server conditions, and despite the fact that the majority of chains are short (60% are no longer than 1 MB), the vast majority of the bytes requested are sequential. We also observe that during a viewing session, client devices behave in recognizable patterns. We characterize sessions using transient, stable and inactive phases. We find that playback sessions are surprisingly stable; across all sessions 5% of the total session time is spent in transient phases, 79% in stable phases and 16% in inactive phases, and the average duration of a stable phase is 8.5 minutes. Finally we analyze the chains to evaluate different prefetch algorithms and show that by exploiting knowledge about workload characteristics, the workload can be serviced with 13% lower hard drive utilization or 30% less system memory compared to a prefetch algorithm that makes no use of workload characteristics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207