Impact of IQ imbalance on the performance of QSM multiple‐input–multiple‐output system
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quadrature spatial modulation (QSM) is proposed recently as an efficient multiple‐input–multiple‐output wireless communication technique. In QSM, spatial multiplexing gain is achieved through modulating a two‐dimensional spatial constellation diagram in addition to conventional signal modulation. It was demonstrated that QSM can be designed with single in‐phase and quadrature (IQ) transmitter. However, the impact of IQ modulator imperfections, which degrade signal fidelity and overall system performance, has not been studied in the literature. In this study, typical IQ modulator/demodulator is considered for QSM system and the performance of the system is analysed and discussed. In particular, IQ imbalance channel modelling, pair‐wise error probability, and average bit error ratio are discussed. Results reveal that IQ imbalance can lead to significant performance degradation of QSM system and should be carefully addressed for any future deployment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it