MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2529058607 · doi:10.1002/poc.2950

Remote substituent effects on homolytic Fe‐N bond energies of <i>p</i>‐G‐C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>NHFe(CO)<sub>2</sub>(η<sup>5</sup>‐C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>5</sub>) and <i>p</i>‐G‐C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>(COMe)NFe(CO)<sub>2</sub>(η<sup>5</sup>‐C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>5</sub>) studied using Hartree–Fock and density functional theory methods

2012· article· en· W2529058607 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical Organic Chemistry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicFree Radicals and Antioxidants
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersMajor State Basic Research Development Program of ChinaMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
KeywordsChemistryHomolysisSubstituentDelocalized electronDensity functional theoryDissociation (chemistry)Bond-dissociation energyLigand (biochemistry)MetalCrystallographyCatalysisStereochemistryComputational chemistryRadicalMedicinal chemistryPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The nature and strength of metal–ligand bonds in organotransition–metal complexes is crucial to the understanding of organometallic reactions and catalysis. The Fe‐N homolytic bond dissociation energies [Δ H homo (Fe‐N)′s] of two series of para‐substituted Fp anilines p ‐G‐C 6 H 4 NHFp [1] and p ‐G‐C 6 H 4 N(COMe)Fp [2] were studied using the Hartree–Fock (HF) and the density functional theory methods with large basis sets. In this study, Fp is (η 5 ‐C 5 H 5 )Fe(CO) 2 and G are NO 2 , CN, COMe, CO 2 Me, CF 3 , Br, Cl, F, H, Me, MeO and NMe 2 . The results show that BP86 and TPSSTPSS can provide the best price/performance ratio and accurate predictions of Δ H homo (Fe‐N)′s. B3LYP can also satisfactorily predict the α and remote substituent effects on Δ H homo (Fe‐N)′s [ΔΔ H homo (Fe‐N)′s]. The good correlations [ r = 0.96 (g, 1), 0.99(g, 2)] of ΔΔ H homo (Fe‐N)′s in series 1 and 2 with the substituent σ p + constants imply that the para‐substituent effects on Δ H homo (Fe‐N)′s originate mainly from polar effects, but those on radical stability originate from both spin delocalization and polar effects. ΔΔ H homo (Fe‐N)′s(1,2) conform to the captodative principle. Insight from this work may help the design of more effective catalytic processes. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0130.013
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0150.008
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0060.008
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0060.005
Research integrity0.0080.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it