Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article examines the immediate legacy of Samuel Richardson’s Sir Charles Grandison following its publication in late 1753 and early 1754, and the ways in which this work helped to shape the popular novels of the mid-1750s, 1760s, and early 1770s. As much as novels of this period drew upon Grandison for plot points, they responded to the grand ideological vision of Richardson’s final published fiction. I argue that Grandison offers a vision of personal virtue that functions as a greater, organizing social principle. Its ultimate expression is the stable community, bonded together through prosperous marriage and the power of personal example and superintendence. Richardson’s Sir Charles embodies a vision of the magnetically virtuous individual whose duty and pleasure it is to draw together the community—and perhaps even the nation. This conceptualization of virtue provides a key reference point for popular fiction after Richardson, whether it is imitated, repurposed, or openly mocked.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it