The Ecclesiological Gothic Revival in Southwestern Ontario: Three Churches By Gordon W. Lloyd (1832-1905)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the mid-nineteenth century, England experienced a regained interest in the Gothic Revival architectural style. Eventually, the doctrines outlined in English nineteenth-century Gothic Revival publications made their way to Canada, and Gothic subsequently became the preferred building style of various architects who were building Anglican churches in southwestern Ontario. The little-studied architect Gordon W. Lloyd was one of them. Born and trained in England, Lloyd had become well acquainted with the discourse on Gothic Revival architecture coming out of England. During the 1800s, Lloyd began building several Anglican churches in the Gothic Revival style in the Huron diocese of Ontario, including St. John’s Anglican Church, Strathroy (1863- Lloyd addition in 1874), Trinity Anglican Church, St. Thomas (1876-77), and New St. Paul’s Anglican Church, Woodstock (1877-79). In this study I examine these three Lloyd churches to determine where they fit into the larger picture of England and Canada’s nineteenth-century Gothic architectural Revival.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it