PyramidViz: Visual Analytics and Big Data Visualization for Frequent Patterns
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Frequent pattern mining aims discover implicit, previously unknown and potentially useful knowledge in the form of frequently co-occurring items, events, or objects. These discovered frequent patterns helps reveal interesting relationships such as consumer shopper behaviour. Existing mining algorithms mostly return a long textual list of frequent patterns to users. Such a long list may not be comprehensible by many users. As a picture is worth a thousand words, visual representation of frequent patterns is more comprehensible. Consequently, several visualizers have been proposed. While they are popular and benefit from a few advantages, they also suffer from some disadvantages. In this paper, we present a visual analytic solution, called PyramidViz, for visualizing and analyzing frequent patterns. PyramidViz shows frequent patterns in an informative and intuitive fashion so that users can easily get an insight about frequency of frequent patterns and relationships (e.g., prefix- extension relationships) among related frequent patterns. Evaluation results show the effectiveness and practicality of PyramidViz in visual analytics and big data visualization of frequent patterns for various reallife applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it