NESTING BIOLOGY OF THE YELLOW WARBLER AT THE NORTHERN LIMIT OF ITS RANGE
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The nesting biology of the Yellow Warbler (Dendroica petechia) was studied at the northern limit of its breeding range at Churchill, Canada. This region is colder and has a shorter breeding season than any in which the species was previously studied. Yellow Warblers arrived in Churchill before most deciduous vegetation had emerged and, in some instances, when snow still covered the ground. Warblers at this location built larger and better insulated nests than in southern populations, presumably as an adaptation against the cooler temper- atures. Clutch size averaged 4.65 eggs and was larger than in all other populations studied so far, except those in Alaska. Nestlings grew rapidly and survivorship was similar to southern populations; only about 4% of chicks were lost through brood reduction. Males fed young more frequently than females or males in southern areas. These observations suggest that Yellow Warblers may compensate for the short subarctic summer by arriving on the breeding grounds earlier, building larger and better insulated nests, and investing more in male pa- rental care than birds in other locations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it